Commentary

Media and Communication as a Field of Research

Author: Kaarle Nordenstreng (University of Tampere)

  • Media and Communication as a Field of Research

    Commentary

    Media and Communication as a Field of Research

    Author:

Abstract

The field has been characterized by enormous expansion and diversification with abundance and popularity not resulting in integration. This contribution ­considers the roots of the discipline to be very long leading back to the enlightenment, early democracy and diverse international sources such as the first freedom of ­information bill in Sweden's Diet in 1766 and the nineteenth century as Hardt (2001) details.

Academically the field is something of a sunrise industry comparable even to computer science and biotechnology as Web of Science data (Nordenstreng, 2015) indicates with exponential growth notable from the 1990s. Dramatic increases in publications, students and the blossoming of associations has followed. Dominated by US/English language research, diversification has been felt in approach and focus (Koivisto and Thomas, 2010). Looking back to an earlier phase concerned with modernization is however instructive for example Lerner (1958) or the comments and debate surrounding Berelson (1959). Currently, extremely dispersed ­communication studies is characterized by presentism with gaps such as the absence of national histories of communication research very apparent.

Reporting Denis McQuail’s thoughts on the conference’s headings this ­contribution suggests that traditions of inquiry from social science and literary/cultural studies have not been ‘resolved or got together’ (Nordenstreng, 2015).

Keywords: presentism, media studies, modernization, publications, Mass communication

How to Cite:

Nordenstreng, K., (2017) “Media and Communication as a Field of Research”, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 12(1), p.40-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.254

573 Views

125 Downloads

Published on
30 Jan 2017
Peer Reviewed

Download the audio file here: https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.254.s1

Notes

  1. The contributor’s original powerpoint presentation (Nordenstreng, 2015) may be viewed as a PDF. See below. [^]

Competing Interests

The author has no competing interests to declare.

Author Information

From 1971 Kaarle Nordenstreng has worked as Professor of Journalism and Mass Communication, at the University of Tampere with visiting professorships undertaken at numerous universities including those of Maryland, Minnesota and Texas at Austin. He is the author or editor of over 30 books including the co-authored Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies (2009), winner of the Frank Luther Mott-Kappa Tau Alpha Research Award for best research-based book on journalism/mass communication (2010) and more recently the edited books (with Daya Thussu) Mapping BRICS Media (2015) and (with Richard C. Vincent) Towards Equity in Global Communication (2016).

References

B. Berelson, (1959).  The state of communication research.  Public Opinion Quarterly 23 (1) : 1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/266840

H. Hardt, (2001).  Social Theories of the Press: Constituents of Communication Research, 1840s to 1920s. 2nd Edn. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

J. Koivisto, P. D. Thomas, (2010).  Mapping Communication and Media Research: Conjunctures, Institutions, Challenges. Tampere: University of Tampere Press. Available at http://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/66336.

D. Lerner, (1958).  The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press.

Nordenstreng, (2015).  New/Old Theory in Media Cultural Studies Plenary Presentation in Conference Reframing Media/Cultural Studies in the Age of Global Crisis. 19–20 June 2015, University of Westminster Available at http://www.uta.fi/cmt/en/contact/staff/kaarlenordenstreng/publications/London200615.pdf.